Highlight

2009 Report
HDR 2009 logo
Overcoming barriers:
Human mobility and development

Read more

Human Development Report 2009

Azerbaijan

The Human Development Index - going beyond income

Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has published the human development index (HDI) which looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). The index is not in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not, for example, include important indicators such as gender or income inequality nor more difficult to measure concepts like respect for human rights and political freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism for viewing human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being.

Of the components of the HDI, only income and gross enrolment are somewhat responsive to short term policy changes. For that reason, it is important to examine changes in the human development index over time. The human development index trends tell an important story in that respect. HDI scores in all regions have increased progressively over the years (Figure 1) although all have experienced periods of slower growth or even reversals.

Figure 1: HDI Trends

This year's HDI, which refers to 2007, highlights the very large gaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide our increasingly interconnected world. The HDI for Azerbaijan is 0.787, which gives the country a rank of 86th out of 182 countries with data (Table 1).

Table 1: Azerbaijan’s human development index 2007
HDI value Life expectancy at birth
(years)
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and above)
Combined gross enrolment ratio
(%)
GDP per capita
(PPP US$)
1. Norway (0.971) 1. Japan (82.7) 1. Georgia (100.0) 1. Australia (114.2) 1. Liechtenstein (85,382)
84. Armenia (0.798) 99. Indonesia (70.5) 11. Russian Federation (99.5) 118. Albania (67.8) 82. Thailand (8,135)
85. Ukraine (0.796) 100. Guatemala (70.1) 12. Turkmenistan (99.5) 119. Namibia (67.2) 83. Dominica (7,893)
86. Azerbaijan (0.787) 101. Azerbaijan (70.0) 13. Azerbaijan (99.5) 120. Azerbaijan (66.2) 84. Azerbaijan (7,851)
87. Thailand (0.783) 102. Egypt (69.9) 14. Armenia (99.5) 121. Syrian Arab Republic (65.7) 85. Peru (7,836)
88. Iran (Islamic Republic of) (0.782) 103. Vanuatu (69.9) 15. Poland (99.3) 122. Angola (65.3) 86. Suriname (7,813)
182. Niger (0.340) 176. Afghanistan (43.6) 151. Mali (26.2) 177. Djibouti (25.5) 181. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (298)

By looking at some of the most fundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities the HDI provides a much more complete picture of a country's development than other indicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 2 illustrates that countries on the same level of HDI can have very different levels of income or that countries with similar levels of income can have very different HDIs.

Figure 2: The human development index gives a more complete picture than income

Human poverty: focusing on the most deprived in multiple dimensions of poverty

The HDI measures the average progress of a country in human development. The Human Poverty Index (HPI-1), focuses on the proportion of people below certain threshold levels in each of the dimensions of the human development index - living a long and healthy life, having access to education, and a decent standard of living. By looking beyond income deprivation, the HPI-1 represents a multi-dimensional alternative to the $1.25 a day (PPP US$) poverty measure.

The HPI-1 value of 10.7% for Azerbaijan, ranks 50th among 135 countries for which the index has been calculated.

The HPI-1 measures severe deprivation in health by the proportion of people who are not expected to survive to age 40. Education is measured by the adult illiteracy rate. And a decent standard of living is measured by the unweighted average of people not using an improved water source and the proportion of children under age 5 who are underweight for their age. Table 2 shows the values for these variables for Azerbaijan and compares them to other countries.


Table 2: Selected indicators of human poverty for Azerbaijan
Human Poverty Index
(HPI-1)
Probability of not surviving to age 40
(%)
Adult illiteracy rate
(%ages 15 and above)
People not using an improved water source
(%)
Children underweight for age
(% aged under 5)
1. Czech Republic (1.5) 1. Hong Kong, China (SAR) (1.4) 1. Georgia (0.0) 1. Barbados (0) 1. Croatia (1)
48. Guyana (10.2) 77. Trinidad and Tobago (8.4) 11. Russian Federation (0.5) 102. Nicaragua (21) 43. Mongolia (6)
49. Paraguay (10.5) 78. Ukraine (8.4) 12. Turkmenistan (0.5) 103. Lesotho (22) 44. Panama (7)
50. Azerbaijan (10.7) 79. Azerbaijan (8.6) 13. Azerbaijan (0.5) 104. Azerbaijan (22) 45. Azerbaijan (7)
51. Jamaica (10.9) 80. Paraguay (8.9) 14. Armenia (0.5) 105. Paraguay (23) 46. China (7)
52. Bolivia (11.6) 81. Kyrgyzstan (9.2) 15. Poland (0.7) 106. Senegal (23) 47. Colombia (7)
135. Afghanistan (59.8) 153. Lesotho (47.4) 151. Mali (73.8) 150. Afghanistan (78) 138. Bangladesh (48)

Building the capabilities of women

The HDI measures average achievements in a country, but it does not incorporate the degree of gender imbalance in these achievements. The gender-related development index (GDI), introduced in Human Development Report 1995, measures achievements in the same dimensions using the same indicators as the HDI but captures inequalities in achievement between women and men. It is simply the HDI adjusted downward for gender inequality. The greater the gender disparity in basic human development, the lower is a country's GDI relative to its HDI.

Azerbaijan's GDI value, 0.779 should be compared to its HDI value of 0.787. Its GDI value is 99.0% of its HDI value. Out of the 155 countries with both HDI and GDI values, 88 countries have a better ratio than Azerbaijan's.

Table 3 shows how Azerbaijan’s ratio of GDI to HDI compares to other countries, and also shows its values for selected underlying indicators in the calculation of the GDI.

Table 3: The GDI compared to the HDI – a measure of gender disparity
GDI as % of HDI Life expectancy at birth
(years)
2004
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and older)
2004

Female as % male Female as % male
1. Mongolia (100.0%) 1. Russian Federation (121.7%) 1. Lesotho (122.5%)
87. Iceland (99.0%) 71. Luxembourg (107.2%) 38. Samoa (99.5%)
88. Samoa (99.0%) 72. Panama (107.1%) 39. Albania (99.4%)
89. Azerbaijan (99.0%) 73. Azerbaijan (107.1%) 40. Azerbaijan (99.4%)
90. Indonesia (99.0%) 74. Mauritania (107.1%) 41. Poland (99.4%)
91. Cape Verde (98.9%) 75. Austria (107.1%) 42. Bulgaria (99.3%)
155. Afghanistan (88.0%) 190. Swaziland (98.0%) 145. Afghanistan (29.2%)

The gender empowerment measure (GEM) reveals whether women take an active part in economic and political life. It tracks the share of seats in parliament held by women; of female legislators, senior officials and managers; and of female professional and technical workers- and the gender disparity in earned income, reflecting economic independence. Differing from the GDI, the GEM exposes inequality in opportunities in selected areas.

Azerbaijan ranks 100th out of 109 countries in the GEM, with a value of 0.385.

Migration

Every year, millions of people cross national or international borders seeking better living standards. Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health, and improved prospects for their children. Most of the world’s 195 million international migrants have moved from one developing country to another or between developed countries.

Azerbaijan has an emigration rate of 14.3%. The major continent of destination for migrants from Azerbaijan is Europe with 74.3% of emigrants living there.

Table 4: Emigrants
Origin of migrants Emigration rate (%) Major continent of destination for migrants (%)
1. Antigua and Barbuda 45.3 Asia 46.6
13. Bosnia and Herzegovina 25.1 Europe 82.7
29. Belarus 15.2 Europe 86.8
33. Moldova 14.3 Europe 86.7
35. Azerbaijan 14.3 Europe 74.3
36. Serbia 13.6 Europe 72.3
44. Estonia 12.2 Europe 81.1
120. Czech Republic 3.5 Europe 66.9
181. Mongolia 0.3 Europe 40.7
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 9.5 Europe 69.9
Medium human development 1.9 Asia 43.3
World 3.0 Europe 33.4

The United States is host to nearly 40 million international migrants – more than any other country though as a share of total population it is Qatar which has the most migrants – more than 4 in every 5 people are migrants. In Azerbaijan, there are 254.5 thousand migrants which represent 3.0% of the total population.

Table 5: Immigrants
Destination of migrants Immigrant stock (thousands) Destination of migrants Immigrants as a share of population (%) 2005
1. United States 39,266.5 1. Qatar 80.5
2. Russian Federation 12,079.6 20. Kazakhstan 19.6
81. Tajikistan 306.4 83. Georgia 4.3
83. Kyrgyzstan 288.1 92. Hungary 3.3
87. Azerbaijan 254.5 97. Azerbaijan 3.0
93. Turkmenistan 223.7 102. Malta 2.9
96. Estonia 201.7 105. Albania 2.7
165. Malta 11.7 155. Romania 0.6
182. Vanuatu 1.0 182. China 0.0
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 30,993.2 Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 5.1
Medium human development 40,948.6 Medium human development 0.8
World 195,245.4 World 3.0

Remittances

Remittances, which are usually sent to immediate family members who have stayed behind, are among the most direct benefits from migration; their benefits spread broadly into local economies. They also serve as foreign exchange earnings for the origin countries of migrants. However, remittances are unequally distributed. Of the total US$370 billion remitted in 2007, more than half went to countries in the medium human development category against less than one per cent to low human development countries. In 2007, US$1,287 million in remittances were sent to Azerbaijan. Average remittances per person were US$152, compared with the average for Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS of US$114. (See Table 6 for more details.)

Table 6: Remittances
Total remittance inflows
(US$ millions)
Remittances per capita
(US$)
1. India 35,262 1. Luxembourg 3,355
7. Poland 10,496 7. Bosnia and Herzegovina 640
56. Croatia 1,394 45. Cyprus 201
57. Czech Republic 1,332 53. Georgia 158
58. Azerbaijan 1,287 56. Azerbaijan 152
61. Turkey 1,209 61. Slovenia 142
64. Albania 1,071 65. Kyrgyzstan 134
131. Malta 40 129. Kazakhstan 14
157. Burundi 0 157. Burundi 0
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 49,618 Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 114
Medium human development 189,093 Medium human development 44
World 370,765 World 58

Azerbaijan was mentioned in the Report in pages 54 and 116.
Use this link to access the complete set of country data.